Attachment FCCLetter

FCCLetter

LETTER submitted by FCC

Letter to Applicant seeking additional information by September 13, 2007

2007-08-14

This document pretains to SES-LIC-20070416-00479 for License on a Satellite Earth Station filing.

IBFS_SESLIC2007041600479_585244

                                 Federal Communications Commission
                                           Washington, D.C. 20554


                                                   August 14, 2007


Keith H. Fagan
Telenor Satellite, Inc.
1101 Wootton Parkway
10th Floor
Rockville, MD 20852

                                                        Re: Call Sign E000284
                                                            File No. SES—LIC—20070416—00479

Dear Mr. Fagan:

        This letter responds to the above—captioned application of Telenor Satellite, Inc. (Telenor) to
operate up to 1000 Inmarsat C half—duplex mobile earth terminals (MET‘s) in the United States in the
Mobile Satellite Service (MSS). Telenor seeks authority for these METS to communicate with the
Inmarsat 4F2 AOR—E satellite at 52.75° W.L., the Inmarsat 3F2 AOR—W satellite at 15.5° W.L., and the
Inmarsat 3F3 POR satellite at 178.1° E.L. using L—band frequencies.‘ We request that Telenor provide,
by ame?dmem, additional information concerning the application in order to allow further Commission
review."

         First. in Attachment A, Technical Description, for the Inmarsat 3F2 and 3F3 spacecraft, Telenor
indicates that, at end of life, these spacecraft will be maneuvered to a disposal orbit with a minimum
perigee height of 194 km above the normal GSO operational orbit. In addition, Telenor states that,
"[u}Jpon reaching the final disposal orbit, all fuel tanks will be close to empty. All remaining propellants
will be vented where possible regarding the requirement for stability of the final orbit minimum perigee
height."
         It appears from this disclosure that not all remaining propellants will be vented at end of life.
Please provide any further information to justify this course of action, such as a more detailed explanation
of the energy that would be imparted from full venting and its effects on the orbit of the satellite upon
cessation of all disposal and decommissioning operations. In particular, we seek information on what the
minimum perigee disposal altitude would be if all remaining propellants were vented at end of life.
Additionally, we ask Telenor to explain why Inmarsat‘s requirement for the stability of the final orbit
minimum perigee height does not permit the venting of all remaining propellants at the end of life of the
spacecraft, given the Commission‘s finding that prevention of accidental explosions during and after
mission operations may constitute the single most important debris mitigation measure." In short, we


‘ For purposes of this letter. the L—band consists of the 1525—1545 and 1626.5—1646.5 MHz bands.

* See 47 CFR. § 25.111(a).

* See Mitigation of Orbital Debris. Second Report and Order. IB Docket No. 02—54. 19 FCC Red 11567, 11580
(para. 29) (2004) (Second Report and Order). We also note that Section 25.283(c) of the Commission‘s rules sets
forth a requirement to vent fuel. relieve pressure vessels, and discharge batteries at the spacecraft‘s end of life.
Specifically. this section provides that "[uJpon completion of any relocation authorized by paragraph (b) of this
section,. or any relocation at end—of—life specified in an authorization. or upon a spacecraft otherwise completing its


seek clarification of whythe public interest would be better served by the proposed plan, given the
possible risk of an accidental explosion resulting from not fully venting residual fuel, and why a stable
orbit cannot be maintained consistent with full venting."
         Second, Telenor states in Attachment A to its application that the Inmarsat 3F2 and 3F3 satellites
are controlled and monitored remotely from locations outside the United States. We ask that Telenor
provide the street address and telephone number of these TT&C control points in item S14 of Schedule S.

         Finally, we observe that Telenor states, in the narrative of Attachment A to its application, that
the Inmarsat satellites will provide MSS to small user terminals in North America using the 1525 — 1559
MHz band for space—to—Earth transmissions and the 1626.5—1660.5 MHz band for Earth—to—space
transmissions. In response to item S2e of Schedule S, however, there appears to be a transcription error
in that the "T (for "transmit") and "R" (for "receive") are reversed for the two frequency bands. A
similar transcription error occurs in response to item S9d of the attached Schedule S. We ask Telenor to
correct these errors in any future filings.

         Telenor must submit the requested information within thirty calendar days from the date of this
letter. Failure to submit the requested information will result in dismissal of the application pursuant to
Section 25.112(c) of the Commission‘s rules.



                                                       Sincerely,




                                                       Scott A. Kotler
                                                       Chief, Systems Analysis Branch
                                                       Satellite Division
                                                       International Bureau

ce:      Bruce Jacobs
         Tony Lin
         Pillsbury Winthrop
           Shaw Pittman, LLP
         2300 N Street, NW
         Washington, DC 20037—1128
         Counsel to Mobile Satellite Ventures
            Subsidiary LLC




authorized mission, a space station licensee shall ensure. unless prevented by technical failures beyond its control,
that all stored energy sources on board the satellite are discharged,. by venting excess propellant. discharging
batteries, relieving pressure vessels. and other appropriate measures." 47 C.F.R. § 25.283(c).

* The Commission has noted that it may. in some instances, be preferable even to dispose of a spacecraft in the GEO
region rather than risk an accidental explosion. since the consequences of an explosive fragmentation "considerably
outweigh" the future collision risks. See Second Report and Order, 19 FCC Red at 11601 n.210.



Document Created: 2019-04-13 07:51:27
Document Modified: 2019-04-13 07:51:27

© 2025 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC