Iridium - Intelsat 1

REPLY submitted by Iridium Satellite LLC

Reply of Iridium Satellite LLC

2018-06-21

This document pretains to SAT-LOA-20171027-00145 for Application to Launch and Operate on a Satellite Space Stations filing.

IBFS_SATLOA2017102700145_1431781

                                                BEFORE THE
                               FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
                                     WASHINGTON, D.C. 20554

    In the Matter of
                                                                                File No.
    Intelsat License LLC
                                                                                SAT-LOA-20171027-00145
    Application for Authority to Launch and Operate Intelsat 15R, a
    Replacement Satellite With New Frequencies, at 85.0º E.L.


                               REPLY OF IRIDIUM SATELLITE LLC

          On May 29, 2018, Iridium Satellite LLC (“Iridium”) filed comments on the above-

referenced application of Intelsat License LLC (“Intelsat”) to launch and operate Intelsat 15R, a

geostationary orbit (“GSO”) space station that would operate in the fixed-satellite service. 1 In its

comments, Iridium asked the Commission to adopt its standard condition requiring Intelsat to

comply with Sections 25.258 and 25.278 of the Commission’s rules in the non-geostationary

satellite orbit mobile-satellite service feeder-link bands. Iridium also asked the Commission to

hold the application in abeyance until Intelsat adequately explains the basis for including in its

FCC application frequency bands that would be notified by another administration.

          Intelsat does not object to the condition sought by Iridium. 2 Though Intelsat questions

the need for the condition in light of the “substantial similarity” between the instant application

and the previously granted application to launch and operate Galaxy 15R, Intelsat fails to

recognize that the Commission adopted the same condition for Galaxy 15R that Iridium seeks

here. 3 The Commission therefore should follow its precedent and ensure that any grant includes


1
      See Comments of Iridium Satellite LLC, IBFS File No. SAT-LOA-20171027-00145 (filed May 29, 2018).
2
      See Response of Intelsat License LLC at 4-6, IBFS File No. SAT-LOA-20171027-00145 (filed June 13, 2018)
      (“Intelsat Response”).
3
      See Application for Authority to Launch and Operate Galaxy 15R, a Replacement Satellite With New
      Frequencies, at 133.0 W.L., Stamp Grant at 5, IBFS File No. SAT-LOA-20170524-00078 (May 10, 2018). See


                                                       1


the condition sought by Iridium.

        Intelsat does oppose Iridium’s request for more information, claiming that “applications

where the operator sought to operate some frequencies pursuant to a non-U.S. ITU filing” are

“routinely granted” by the Commission.4 This is simply incorrect. As Iridium explained in its

comments, the Commission’s two-step process for submitting ITU filings contemplates that a

GSO space station operator will submit an FCC application that includes the “frequency bands . .

. proposed in the Coordination Request” submitted by the Commission to the ITU, and not by

another notifying administration. 5 Perhaps unsurprisingly, out of the many space station

authorizations granted by the Commission, Intelsat points to just one where the grant included

frequencies notified by a foreign administration. 6 If Intelsat believes that specific circumstances

warrant another departure from the normal course, it should explain those circumstances in its

application. That is all Iridium has asked.

        Indeed, that sole FCC decision cited by Intelsat demonstrates the need for the information

Iridium requested. When applying for an FCC license to launch and operate Intelsat 37e, Intelsat

included several bands notified either by both the United States and the United Kingdom or by

the United Kingdom exclusively. 7 In the Intelsat 37e application, Intelsat at least attempted to

explain its basis for doing so, and why its request would not raise concerns around abuse of the




    also Application for Authority to Launch and Operate Intelsat 33e, a Replacement Satellite With New
    Frequencies, Stamp Grant at 3, IBFS File No. SAT-LOA-20150327-00016 (Feb. 25, 2016) (adopting a similar
    condition).
4
    Intelsat Response at 4.
5
    See Comprehensive Review of Licensing & Operating Rules for Satellite Servs., Second Report and Order, 30
    FCC Rcd. 14713, 14723 ¶ 23 (2015).
6
    See Intelsat Response at 4 & n.11, citing Application for Authority to Launch and Operate Intelsat 37e, a
    C/Ku/Ka-band Replacement Satellite, Stamp Grant at Condition No. 5, File No. SAT-LOA-20160915-00089
    (June 8, 2017).
7
    See Engineering Statement at 9-10, SAT-LOA-20160915-00089 (Sept. 15, 2016).



                                                       2


international coordination process. Intelsat stated that it had included the frequencies to request

that the United States “state its non-objection” to the use of Intelsat 37e to bring into use

frequency assignments contained in the UK filings, 8 citing an ITU circular letter explaining that

although such arrangements create “opportunities for abusive practices,” they may serve

legitimate fleet management purposes in some cases. 9 Thus, although the Intelsat 37e

application is no model of clarity, it fully supports the view that Intelsat should be required to

explain why an FCC license for spectrum notified by Papua New Guinea would serve the public

interest in this case.

                                               CONCLUSION

         The Commission should condition Intelsat’s license on compliance with 47 C.F.R. §§

25.258 and 25.278 in the 19.4-19.6 GHz and 29.1-29.3 GHz bands, relief which Intelsat does not

oppose. Moreover, the Commission should require Intelsat to justify the need for including those

frequencies, which would be notified by Papua New Guinea and not the United States, in any

grant of authority by the FCC.

                                                   Respectfully submitted,



Maureen C. McLaughlin                              Scott Blake Harris
Vice President, Public Policy                      V. Shiva Goel
IRIDIUM SATELLITE LLC                              HARRIS, WILTSHIRE & GRANNIS LLP
1750 Tysons Boulevard, Suite 1400                  1919 M Street, NW, 8th Floor
McLean, VA 22102                                   Washington, DC 20036
(703) 287-7518                                     (202) 730-1330
                                                   Counsel to Iridium Satellite LLC

June 21, 2018



8
    Id. at 10.
9
    See ITU Circular Letter CR/333 at 3 (May 2, 2012), https://www.itu.int/dms_pub/itu-r/md/00/cr/cir/R00-CR-
    CIR-0333!!PDF-E.pdf.

                                                       3


                               CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

       I hereby certify that on June 21, 2018, a copy of the foregoing Reply of Iridium

Satellite LLC was sent by first-class, United States mail to the following:


       Susan H. Crandall
       Intelsat License, LLC
       7900 Tysons One Place
       McLean, VA 22102

       Jennifer D. Hindin
       Sara M. Baxenberg
       Wiley Rein LLP
       1776 K Street, NW
       Washington, DC 20006


                                                     ____________________________
                                                     Elizabeth Marley
                                                     Legal Assistant
                                                     Harris, Wiltshire & Grannis LLP
                                                     1919 M Street, NW, 8th Floor
                                                     Washington, DC 20036
                                                     (202) 730-1300



Document Created: 2019-04-11 18:06:23
Document Modified: 2019-04-11 18:06:23

© 2025 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC