EchoStar Petition to

PETITION submitted by EchoStar Satellite Operating Corporation

Petition to Deny or Defer

2014-06-09

This document pretains to SAT-LOA-20130205-00016 for Application to Launch and Operate on a Satellite Space Stations filing.

IBFS_SATLOA2013020500016_1049907

                                   Before the
                     FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
                              Washington, DC 20554


                                                )
In the Matter of                                )
                                                )
DIRECTV Enterprises, LLC                        )     File Nos. SAT-LOA-20130205-00016
                                                )              SAT-AMD-20130716-00094
Application for Authority to Launch and Operate )
DIRECTV KU-45W, a Ku-band Space Station, )            Call Sign S2893
at 45º W.L.                                     )
                                                )

                              PETITION TO DENY OR DEFER

       EchoStar Satellite Operating Corporation (“EchoStar”), pursuant to Section 25.154(a) of

the Commission’s rules, 1 submits this petition (“Petition”) 2 requesting that the Commission

either deny the above-captioned application (“Application”), as amended, of DIRECTV

Enterprises, LLC (together with its affiliates, “DIRECTV”), or defer action on the Application

until DIRECTV addresses certain deficiencies in its revised interference analysis.

       In opposing EchoStar’s pending application to launch operate the ECHO-45W FSS

payload, DIRECTV claims that EchoStar’s downlink interference calculations showing a noise

temperature increase, or ∆T/T, level of 73 percent (for a 65 cm receive antenna) would result in



1
  47 C.F.R. § 25.154(a). EchoStar holds a Brazilian license to launch and operate a Ku-band
satellite for Broadcasting Satellite Service, and has a pending application for an FCC license to
launch and operate a Fixed Satellite Service (“FSS”) payload (“ECHO-45W FSS”) at 45.1º W.L.
See EchoStar, Minor Amendment, IBFS File Nos. SAT-LOA-20120921-00152 & SAT-AMD-
20130614-00085 (June 14, 2013).
2
 This Petition is filed in response to the Public Notice regarding DIRECTV’s amendment
proposing numerous revisions to its Application. See Policy Branch Information: Satellite
Space Applications Accepted for Filing, Public Notice, Report No. SAT-01014, at 1 (May 9,
2014). Specifically, this Petition addresses deficiencies in DIRECTV’s revised interference
analysis.


significant degradation to DIRECTV’s direct-to-home service to Brazil. 3 DIRECTV’s downlink

interference calculations submitted in this proceeding, however, show an even higher ∆T/T level

(for a 65 cm receive antenna) of 74 percent (before correcting a material error in DIRECTV’s

interference analysis, as further discussed below) to as much as 452 percent (after correcting

DIRECTV’s error). 4 If the Commission accepts DIRECTV’s baseless claim that a ∆T/T level of

73 percent is unacceptable for the proposed ECHO-45W FSS payload, then the Commission

consistently should find that the higher ∆T/T level of 74 percent is unacceptable for the proposed

DIRECTV KU-45W satellite and deny the Application on that basis.

        Alternatively, the Commission should defer action on the Application until DIRECTV

addresses certain deficiencies in its revised interference analysis. Specifically, DIRECTV

incorrectly assumed that a 65 cm Ku-band receive antenna will comply with an off-axis antenna

pattern of 29-25*log (theta) at a two-degree orbital separation, but such compliance is not

physically possible. DIRECTV instead should have correctly assumed that a 65 cm Ku-band

receiver antenna will meet the off-axis pattern such as ITU-R Recommendation BO.1213. With

this correction, DIRECTV’s downlink interference calculations would show a substantially

higher ∆T/T level of 452 percent, not 74 percent.

       Additionally, DIRECTV should be required to justify its use of downlink interference

calculations resulting in a ∆T/T level higher than 73 percent, which it claims is unacceptable for


3
  See Letter from William M. Wiltshire, Counsel for DIRECTV Latin American Holdings, Inc.,
to Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary, FCC, IBFS File Nos. SAT-LOA-20120921-00152 & SAT-
AMD-20130614-00085, at 4 (May 2, 2014).
4
 See DIRECTV, Amendment Narrative, IBFS File Nos. SAT-LOA-20130205-00016 & SAT-
AMD-20130716-00094, at 16 (July 16, 2013) (“Amendment Narrative”); see also Letter from
Jennifer A. Manner, EchoStar, to Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary, FCC, IBFS File Nos. SAT-
LOA-20120921-00152 & SAT-AMD-20130614-00085, Attachment (Technical Supplement), at
2 (May 23, 2014) (filed as corrected May 27, 2014).



                                               –2–


EchoStar’s proposed Ku-band FSS operations. In its revised interference analysis, DIRECTV

states that the ∆T/T level for a 1.2 meter receive antenna is below the 6 percent level specified in

the ITU Radio Regulations, but offers no justification for mandating the ITU’s 6 percent level –

which DIRECTV acknowledges is a “coordination trigger,” not an ITU or FCC requirement –

only for EchoStar’s proposed FSS operations on Appendix 30B Ku-band frequencies, and not for

DIRECTV’s proposed FSS operations on unplanned Ku-band frequencies. 5

          Based upon the foregoing, the Commission should either deny DIRECTV’s Application

or defer action until DIRECTV addresses certain deficiencies in its revised interference analysis.



                                              Respectfully submitted,

                                              ECHOSTAR SATELLITE OPERATING
                                              CORPORATION



                                              By: Jennifer A. Manner
                                                  Jennifer A. Manner
                                                  Vice President of Regulatory Affairs
                                                  11717 Exploration Lane
                                                  Germantown, MD 20876


June 9, 2014




5
    See Amendment Narrative at 16.



                                               –3–


                           AFFIDAVIT OF JAIME LONDONO

      I declare under penalty of perjury the following:

1.    I am employed by EchoStar Satellite Services LLC as Vice President, Advanced
      Programs & Spectrum Management, and have been an employee of the company since
      2010.

2.    I am familiar with Part 25 of the Commission’s rules and the ITU Radio Regulations.

3.    I have reviewed the foregoing Petition to Deny or Defer, and the factual statements
      therein are complete and accurate to the best of my knowledge and belief.


                                                    /s/ Jaime Londono
                                                   Jaime Londono

Date: June 9, 2014


                               CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

       I, Theresa Rollins, hereby certify under penalty of perjury that the foregoing Petition to
Deny or Defer was served this 9th day of June, 2014, by depositing a true copy thereof with the
United States Postal Service, first class postage pre-paid, addressed to:

William M. Wiltshire                             Karis A. Hastings
Wiltshire & Grannis LLP                          SatCom Law LLC
1200 18th Street, NW                             1317 F St. NW, Suite 400
Suite 1200                                       Washington, D.C. 20004
Washington, DC 20036
                                                 Counsel for SES Satellites (Gibraltar) Limited
Counsel for DIRECTV Enterprises, LLC



                                                       /s/ Theresa Rollins
                                                           Theresa Rollins



Document Created: 2014-06-09 16:08:26
Document Modified: 2014-06-09 16:08:26

© 2025 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC