Attachment ex parte

This document pretains to SAT-ASG-20030728-00139 for Assignment on a Satellite Space Stations filing.

IBFS_SATASG2003072800139_380597

                            EX PARTE OR LATE FILED 555 Eleventh Street, N.W., Suite 1000
                                                                 Washington, D.C. 20004-1304
                                                                 Tel: (202) 637-2200 Fax: (202)
                                                                 www.1w.com
                                                                                                  @B I G I NA L
                                                                 FIRM I AFFILIATE OFFICES
LATHAMaWATKINW                                                   Boston          New Jersey
                                                                 Brussels        New York
                                                                 Chicago         Northern Virginia
                                                                 Frankfurt       Orange County
                                                                 Hamburg         Paris
   May 25,2004                                                   Hong Kong       San Diego
                                                                 London          San Francisco
                                                                 Los Angeles     Silicon Valley
                                  %B~ench                        Milan           Singapore
   Marlene H. Dortch        ‘ntemtionaf &reau                    Moscow          Tokyo
   Secretary                                                                     Washington, D.C
   Federal Communications Commission                       RECEl VED
   445 12th Street, S.W.
   Washington, D.C. 20554                                   MAY 2 5 2004


                 File No. SAT-MSC-200402 10-00027



          Today, Alan Auckenthaler, General Counsel, Inmarsat Ventures Limited (“Inmarsat”),
   and John Janka of Latham & Watkins met with Paul Margie, Legal Advisor to Commissioner
   Copps. The attached presentation and Inmarsat’s positions of record formed the basis for the
   discussion.

          If you have any questions, please contact me.




  Attachment

  cc:    Paul Margie


                                                                                     May 25,2004


                          Inmarsat Has Complied with the ORBIT Act


*:*   U.S. Interests Are at Stake
      9 U.S. Investment
         0    Lockheed (through Comsat) owns approximately 14% of Inmarsat
              U.S. investors account for over 40% of the capital in the Apax Partners and
              Permira f h d s that control Inmarsat
      9 U.S. Services
         0    U.S. industry relies on Inmarsat as a competitive MSS alternative
         0    Federal, state and local government users need continued access to current and
              next-generation Inmarsat spacecraft
                  Current federal government users include the Department of Defense, U.S.
                  Coast Guard, Department of Homeland Security, and law enforcement

              .   agencies
                  The Department of Defense has indicated its interest in and intent to use
                  Inmarsat’s next-generation BGAN service
         0    Next-generation Inmarsat spacecraft will offer a new class of mobile
              broadband services to consumers in underserved parts of the U.S.
*:*   Inmarsat’s Initial Public Offering and Signatow Ownership Dilution
      9 Prior to the fall of 2003, Inmarsat had prepared five times for a public equity
        offering, incurring expenses of over $10 million
         0    Each time, weak financial markets foiled Inmarsat’s efforts
      9 In late 2003, Inmarsat faced:
         0    a continued weak equity market with no sure prospect for improvement
         0    former Signatories seeking to divest their ownership interests
         0    a takeover proposal it was obligated to consider under the UK Takeover Code
      9 The Board determined that the proposal made by Apax Partners and Permira was
        in the best interests of the company and its owners
              former Signatory ownership would be diluted by more than 50%
              positive control and majority ownership interests would be acquired by funds
              controlled by new, non-Signatory entities
              management would obtain a vested interest in the company through its own
              ownership interest
              Inmarsat would become a public company, subject to national securities
              regulation through the issuance of publicly traded debt securities



File No. SAT-MSC-20040210-00027                                             Inmarsat Ventures Limited


                                                                                     May 25,2004



      h The takeover was structured as a leveraged buy out, reliant on money to be raised
          through the issuance of public debt securities
          0   the takeover and resulting dilution would not have occurred but for the
              subsequently planned initial public offering of debt
          0   "Series A" debt securities were sold and listed for trading on the Luxembourg
              Stock Exchange
          0   after completion of a forthcoming SEC registration, the Series A securities
              will be exchanged for "Series B" securities, which will be freely and publicly
              tradeable in the U.S.
e:*   Inmarsat Has Satisfied the Purposes of ORBIT Act
      9 Through an initial public offering, Inmarsat has substantially diluted the aggregate
        ownership interests of former Signatories
          0   As a result of its initial public offering, 57% of the ownership of Inmarsat

              .
              resides with non-Signatory, non-governmental entities
                  This is over two fimes the level of dilution recognized as "substantial" in
                  the New Skies decision
                  70 of 85 former Signatories have fully redeemed their ownership interest
                  in the company
                  3 former Signatories hold a residual interest of only one share
              = Foreign government ownership has been substantially reduced
              .   Only 12 of 85 former Signatories hold an interest similar to what they held
                  before
          0

              .
              Inmarsat has financed this dilution through an initial public offering
                  Inmarsat has conducted an P O in Luxembourg of Series A debt securities
                  The expert U.S. agency on securities matters recognizes Inmarsat's
                  forthcoming A/B exchange as an "initial public offering" in the U.S.
                      The A/F3 exchange of debt securities to be registered at the SEC is an
                      Exxon CupituZ transaction that the SEC deems an initial public offering
          0   The initial public offering of debt and the buyout of the equity ownership
              interests of the former Signatories are part of the same transaction and cannot
              be examined independently
      >   Inmarsat has securities listed for trading on a major stock exchange with
          transparent and effective securities regulation
          0   The listing of debt securities on the Luxembourg Stock Exchange has
              subjected Inmarsat to the transparent and effective security regulations of both
              that exchange and the European Union
          0   Inmarsat soon will subject to regulation by the U.S. Securities and Exchange
              Commission as well

                                               2
File No. SAT-MSC-20040210-00027                                             Inmarsat Ventures Limited


                                                                                       May 25,2004


 *:   Inmarsat Has Complied with the Initial Public Offering Requirement of the
      ORBIT Act
      P The plain language of the Act provides for apubZic offeying of securities, which
        allows an offering of either debt or equity securities
          0   This general language amends the Satellite Act of 1962 (the predecessor of the
              ORBIT Act), where Congress specifically required Comsat to issue voting
              stock to the American public
      P As an initial step to funding the buyout of Signatories, Inmarsat conducted a
        public offering of debt securities in Luxembourg
      k Next, Inmarsat is effectuating an Exxon CupitaZ A/B exchange of debt securities
          in a U.S. “initial public offering” as recognized by the U.S. Securities and
          Exchange Commission
*:*   Inmarsat’s Listing of Debt Securities Is “Consistent With” the ORBIT Act
      P Inmarsat is subject to the transparent and effective securities regulations of
        Luxembourg and the EU, as a result of the public offering of debt securities in
        Europe
      > Inmarsat will be subject to U.S. federal securities regulations at the conclusion of
        the A B exchange public offering
      > The ORBIT Act provides the Commission with flexibility to find Inmarsat’s
        listing of debt “consistent with” the Act
          0   Congress granted the Commission this discretion so that the purpose of the
              Act would not be frustrated by an overly technical application of the statute
              = The goal of the Act is to promote a hlly competitive global market for
                   satellite communications services by hlly privatizing Inmarsat
              = The Administration and two key Senators have recognized that Inmarsat
                   has satisfied the purpose of the ORBIT Act
         0    Exercise of this discretion is warranted here
              = The overarching goal of the ORBIT Act has been met
              = No stated purpose of the Act would be advanced by requiring a separate
                  listing of some type of Inmarsat equity securities
                  +    The level of U.S. federal securities regulation or securities regulation
                       in Luxembourg or the EU would not be any more effective
                  +    No greater dilution would occur
                       Control over the company would not change
                       No increase in competition in the satellite communications services
                       market would result




                                                3
File No. SAT-MSC-20040210-00027                                              Inmarsat Ventures Limited



Document Created: 2004-06-08 15:02:54
Document Modified: 2004-06-08 15:02:54

© 2025 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC