Attachment X2nSat DA 14-512 rel

X2nSat DA 14-512 rel

DECISION submitted by IB,FCC

DA 14-512

2014-04-16

This document pretains to SES-LIC-20130926-00838 for License on a Satellite Earth Station filing.

IBFS_SESLIC2013092600838_1043331

Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 April 16, 2014 DA 14—512 Mr. Enrique Amezcua X2nSat 1310 Redwood Way Petaluma, CA 94954 enrique@x2nsat.com Call Sign: E130177 File No.: SES—LIC—20130926—00838 Dear Mr. Amezcua: On September 26, 2013, X2nSat refiled the above—captioned application‘ for a new VSAT network that includes a fixed earth station, located in Petaluma, CA, and three types of remote earth stations. * All earth stations would access the SES—2 (Call Sign $2826) satellite at the 87° W.L. orbital location, from points within CONUS, Alaska, Hawaii, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands in the 11.7—12.2 GHz (space—to—Earth) and 14.0—14.5 GHz (Earth—to—space) frequency bands. Pursuant to Section 25.112(a)(1) of the Commission‘s rules, 47 C.F.R. § 25.112(a)(1), we dismiss the application, without prejudice to re—filing." Section 25.112 of the Commission‘s rules, 47 C.F.R. § 25.112, requires the Commission to return, as unacceptable for filing, any earth station application that is not substantially complete, contains internal inconsistencies, or does not substantially comply with the Commission‘s rules. For the reason set forth below, we find X2nSat‘s application is deficient and subject to dismissal. In the Commission‘s previous dismissal letter, we requested that, for the 0.75—meter Newtec model MDM2200 antenna, X2nSat submit as part of any re—filed application information related to antenna performance. X21Sat was required to submit information related to any one of the three antenna performance certification methods below: 1. the antenna manufacturer‘s certification that demonstrates compliance with Section 25.209(a) and (b) of the Commission‘s rules, 47 C.F.R. § § 25.209(a) and (b) regarding antenna performance standards; or 2. the certifications listed in Section 25.220(d)(1)(i—iv) of the Commission‘s rules, 47 C.F.R.§ 25.220(d)(1)(i—iv); or, ‘ This application is a re—filing of application SES—LIC—20130903—00775 that was dismissed as defective without prejudice to re—filing in FCC letter, DA 13—1973, released September 24, 2013. * The three types of remote antennas are: 1.8—meter Skyware Global antennas; 1.2—meter Skyware Global antennas, and 0.75—meter Newtec model MDM2200 antennas. > If X2nSat re—files an application identical to the 'application dismissed, with the exception of supplying the corrected information, it need not pay an application fee. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1111(d).

Federal Communications Commission DA 14—512 3. the call sign and specific application file number in which this type of antenna has been previously approved.* X2NSat failed to submit any of the required information. Accordingly, pursuant to Section 25.112(c) of the Commission‘s rules, 47 C.F.R. § 25.112(c), and Section 0.261 of the Commission‘s rules on delegations of authority, 47 C.F.R. § 0.261, we dismiss X2nSat‘s above—captioned application without prejudice to re—filing. Si?ly, o i 7 y Paul E. Blais Chief, Systems Analysis Branch Satellite Division _ International Bureau * rifth Report and Order, 20 FCC Red at 5666 (para. 59). The Commission maintains a list of approved non— routine antennasat http://transition.fee.gov/ib/sd/nresa/#.


Document Created: 2014-04-16 16:28:42
Document Modified: 2014-04-16 16:28:42
© 2025 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC