Attachment DA 081156

DA 081156

DECISION submitted by IB,FCC

DA 081156

2008-05-15

This document pretains to SAT-MOD-20080319-00074 for Modification on a Satellite Space Stations filing.

IBFS_SATMOD2008031900074_642516

                                     Federal Communications Commission
                                           Washington, D.C. 20554

International Bureau

                                                                                                      DA 08-1156

                                                      May 15,2008

Patrick L. Donnelly
Satellite CD Radio, Inc.
1221 Avenue of the Americas
36” Floor
New York, NY 10020

                    Re:   Application of Satellite CD Radio, Inc. to Modify Authorization for €34-6 Satellite,
                          IBFS File No. SAT-MOD-200803 19-00074 (Call Sign S2105)

Dear Mr. Donnelly:

        On March 19,2008, Satellite CD Radio, Inc. (Satellite CD Radio) filed the above-captioned
application to modify its Satellite Digital Audio Radio Service (SDARS) non-geostationary satellite orbit
(NGSO) space station license to allow the launch and operation of the FM-6 satellite and, ultimately, reduce
the number of authorized NGSO satellites in its network. For reasons discussed below, we dismiss the
application as defective, without prejudice to refiling.’

         In its application, Satellite CD Radio provides technical information about the proposed operations
of the FM-6 satellite pursuant to Section 25.1 14 of the Commission’s rules, including disclosure of the
orbital debris mitigation plans for the space station as required by Section 25.1 14(d)( 14).’ As part of the
information required by Section 25.1 14(d)( 14), an applicant must submit information regarding the
assessment and probability of a space station becoming a source of debris by collisions with large debris or
other operational space station^.^ Specifically, for NGSO space stations, the rule requires:
                    The [orbital debris] statement must disclose the accuracy - if any - with which orbital
                    parameters of rzorz-geostationarysatellite orbit space stations will be maintained, including
                    apogee, perigee, inclination, and the right ascension of the ascending rzode(s).

        The Commission has stated that the purpose of disclosing the accuracy with which orbital parameters
will be maintained is to help interested third parties evaluate proposed systems with respect to collision
avoidance and safe-flight profile^.^

         Although Satellite CD Radio has provided information regarding the apogee and perigee of the FM-6
satellite and has specified that the satellite “will be maintained in longitude of apogee at 96.0 degrees West

I
 If Satellite CD Radio re-files an application in which the deficiencies identified in this letter have been corrected but
otherwise identical to the one dismissed, it need not pay an application fee. See 47 C.F.R. 3 1.1 109(d).
    See 47 C.F.R. 0 25.114(d)(14).
    See 47 C.F.R. 5 25.1 14(d)(14)(iii).
4
 See Mitigation of Orbital Debris, Second Report and Order, 19 FCC Rcd 11567, 11584 (para. 37) (2004). See also
Letter from Robert G. Nelson, Chief, Satellite Division, FCC, to Stephen D. Baruch, Counsel, DG Consents Sub, Inc.,
DA 07-34 18, dated July 27,2007 (IBFS File Nos. SAT-MOD-20070223-00038and SAT-AMD-20070504-00066).


                                         Federal Communications Commission                                  DA 08-1156


Longitude within +I- 0.5 degree^,"^ it has not disclosed all the information required under Section
25.1 14(d)(14)(iii). In particular, it is not clear from the modification application whether, for example, the
apogee and perigee indicated represent target values, or whether they constitute an “outer boundary” for the
satellite’s normal operations. Furthermore, Satellite CD Radio does not provide any information on the
accuracy with which the inclination and the right ascension of the ascending node will be maintained.
Without disclosure of the accuracy of all the proposed orbital parameters as part of the application,6third
parties will not be able to evaluate Satellite CD Radio’s proposed system adequately.
         Accordingly, pursuant to Section 25.1 12(a)(l) of the Commission’s rules, 47 C.F.R. 9 25.1 12(a)( l),
and Section 0.261 of the Commission’s rules on delegations of authority, 47 C.F.R. 0 0.261, we dismiss
Satellite CD Radio’s above-captioned modification application without prejudice to refiling.

         Although not grounds for dismissal, we request Satellite CD Radio to provide two additional
clarifications in any future re-filing.

          First, we ask that Satellite CD Radio provide additional information concerning its post-mission
disposal plans for the FM-6 satellite as part of any future filing. As part of its current application, Satellite
CD Radio proposes to dispose of the FM-6 satellite at end of life by circularizing the orbital altitude of the
satellite to an operational perigee of approximately 46,325 kilometers.’ In any future filing, Satellite CD
Radio should confirm the inclination of the disposal orbit, as well as provide any information it has
supporting the long-term stability of the disposal orbit.

         Second, space station antennas in the fixed-satellite service must be designed to provide a cross-
polarization isolation such that the ratio of the on axis co-polar gain to the cross-polar gain of the antenna in
the assigned frequency band shall be at least 30 dB within its primary coverage area.’ Although Satellite CD
Radio states in its Attachment A to its application that the cross polarization isolation of the satellite feeder
link receiver antenna will exceed 30 decibels (dB) within the -3 dB gain contour of the receive frequency,
this value stated as 25 dB in its schedule S filling. We request that Satellite CD Radio confirm the actual
cross-polar isolation of its antenna as part of any future filing.


                                                                           Sincerely,


                                                                           Robert G. Nelson
                                                                           Chief, Satellite Division
                                                                           International Bureau




5
    Application, Attachment A at 24.
    We would consider disclosure of the target figure for apogee, perigee, and inclination, together with a range of values
that might occur during normal operations, to be adequate. An alternative would be to specify maximum anticipated
apogee altitude, minimum anticipated perigee altitude, and the range of anticipated inclinations.
7
    Application, Attachment A at 36.
* 47 C.F.R. 5 25.21O(i)(l).
                                                               2



Document Created: 2008-05-15 12:22:54
Document Modified: 2008-05-15 12:22:54

© 2025 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC