Attachment letter

letter

LETTER submitted by Intelsat

letter

2008-11-12

This document pretains to SAT-AMD-20080916-00188 for Amended Filing on a Satellite Space Stations filing.

IBFS_SATAMD2008091600188_680275

November 12, 2008                                                 FILED/ACCEPTED

VIA HAND DELIVERY                                                      Nov 1 2 2008
                                                               Federal C      ipati         ,
Ms. Marlene H. Dortch                                              C of%m:;"g:’é‘;’ésmctgp;mfsslon
Federal Communications Commission
445 12th Street, S.W.
Washington, D.C. 20554

          Re:       DIRECTV Amendment Application
                    SAT—AMD—20080916—00188

Dear Ms. Dortch:

Intelsat North America LLC ("Intelsat") submits this letter supporting the
November 10, 2008 Response of DIRECTV Enterprises, LLC ("DIRECTV")
to the October 27, 2008 Comments of EchoStar Corporation ("EchoStar")
regarding the above referenced 17/24 GHz Broadcasting Satellite Service
("BSS") amendment application ("Amendment Application") that is a key
component of the Orbital Location Rationalization Agreement
("Rationalization Agreement") among DIRECTV, Intelsat and Pegasus
Development DBS Corporation ("Pegasus") designed to maximize the
operational capabilities of their proposed systems at the nominal 91° W.L., 99°
W.L. and 107° W.L. orbital locations. DIRECTV correctly states that while
EchoStar faults the Rationalization Agreement for not resolving all situations
where there are multiple applicants for a single orbital location, EchoStar
should not be allowed "to make the perfect the enemy of the good."‘

The Commission has urged 17/24 GHz applicants to "reach a compromise
regarding their orbital assignment requests and minimize, or avoid, mutually
exclusive situations.""" The Rationalization Agreement does just that —— by
removing mutual exclusivity at two locations and reducing the number of
parties at a third. As such, the Rationalization Agreement and the Amendment
Application are in the public interest. The fact that EchoStar is not a party to




‘ Response of DIRECTV Enterprises, LLC at 2 (filed Nov. 10, 2008), File No.
SAT—AMD—20080916—00188.
2 See Establishment ofPolicies and Serv. Rulesfor the Broad. Satellite Serv. at
the 17.3—17.7 GHz Frequency Band and at the 17.7—17.8 GHz Frequency Band
Internationally, and at the 24.75—25.25 GHz Frequency Bandfor Fixed
Satellite Servs. Providing Feeder Links to the Broad.—Satellite Serv. andfor the
Satellite Servs. Operating Bi—directionally in the 17.3—17.8 GHz Frequency
Band, Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 22 FCC
Red. 8842, 8902 (« 146) (2007).



Intelsat Corporation
3400 International Drive NW, Washington DC 20008—3006 USA www.intelsat.com T +1 202—944—6800 F+1 202—944—7898


Ms. Marlene H. Dortch
November 12, 2008
Page 2



the Rationalization Agreement does not provide a basis for the Commission to
deny DIRECTV‘s Amendment Application.

Please contact the undersigned should you have any questions.

Regards,




Susan H. Crandall
Assistant General Counsel
Intelsat Corporation


                            CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

        I, Derrick Johnson, do hereby certify that on this 12" day of November, 2008, I
served a true and correct copy of the foregoing letter of Intelsat North America LLC to
the following:


Andrea Kelly*                                       William M. Wiltshire
Federal Communications Commussion                   Michael D. Nilsson
445 12"" Street, S.W.                               Harris, Wiltshire & Grannis LLP
Washington, D.C. 20554                              1200 18"" Street, N.W.
                                                    Washington, D.C. 20036
                                                    Counselfor DIRECTYVEnterprises, LLC


Tony Lin                                            Pantelis Michalopoulos
Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP                 Chung Hsaing Mah
2300 N Street, N.W.                                 Steptoe & Johnson LLP
Washington, D.C. 20037                              Washington, D.C. 20036
Counselfor Pegasus Development                      Counselfor EchoStar Corporation
 DBS Corporation




                                                  Derrick Johnson // _



*By Hand Delivery


                            CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

        I, Derrick Johnson, do hereby certify that on this 12" day of November, 2008, I
served a true and correct copy of the foregoing letter of Intelsat North America LLC to
the following:


Andrea Kelly*                                       William M. Wiltshire
Federal Communications Commission                   Michael D. Nilsson
445 12"" Street, S.W.                               Harris, Wiltshire & Grannis LLP
Washington, D.C. 20554                              1200 18"" Street, N.W.
                                                    Washington, D.C. 20036
                                                    Counselfor DIRECTYEnterprises, LLC

Tony Lin                                            Pantelis Michalopoulos
Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP                 Chung Hsaing Mah
2300 N Street, N.W.                                 Steptoe & Johnson LLP
Washington, D.C. 20037                              Washington, D.C. 20036
Counselfor Pegasus Development                      Counselfor EchoStar Corporation
 DBS Corporation




                                                  Derrick Johnson




*By Hand Delivery



Document Created: 2008-11-18 14:48:34
Document Modified: 2008-11-18 14:48:34

© 2025 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC